Thursday, September 4, 2014

Press Release Of Public Hearing At Jadugoda - May 2011



PRESS RELEASE
PUBLIC HEARING OR MOCKERY OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY

Subject: Public Hearing of the Renewal of the UCIL Bhatin Uranium Mines Lease held on 26.5.2011

The State Pollution Control Board has declared that the public hearing held today on 26.5.2011 for renewal of the UCIL Bhatin Uranium Mines Lease has been a “sucess” and the villagers affected by the project have given the green signal to the project, thereby giving the project life for another 29 years.
This is far from the truth. As in the past the UCIL once again  in collusion with the State Pollution Control Board, the local administration and police and paramilitary forces has managed to get away from its liabilites as a public corporation as smoothly as can be. The public hearing has been declared to be a success without taking on record any dissenting opinion on the EIA/EMP Report, any discussion on the environmental and health impacts of uranium mining.
The State Pollution Control Board which is bound to ensure that all environmental concerns are taken into account has failed in its duty to take all public opinion on record, and has made all efforts to ensure that no dissent is recorded at the public hearing. At the public hearing held today the police and the local administration let alone facilitate the public hearing played the role of agents of the UCIL by ensuring that those who wanted to express their objections to the EIA/EMP report and seek clarifications on the same were not allowed to enter the premises of where the public hearing was being held.
The UCIL has indulged in gross malpractice and has taken advantage of the poverty of the people and their dependecy on the company for livelihood, and has mobbilised villagers most of whom are illegal contract workers to support their mining projects. The UCIL has distributed washing machines, sewing machines, sarees to allure the villagers, and manipultate the public hearing.
The UCIL ever since its inception has indulged in propaganda that people, organizations and movements that raise the issues of radiation, environment and health concerns are not concered with the peoples needs of livelihood. Hence the UCIL is responsible for not allowing any public debate on environmental and health concerns that arise out of uranium mining. The UCIL a day before the public hearing once again attempted to defame earlier studies made which establish the adverse impacts of uranium minig on health and environment. All efforts made to raise public consciousness and create a debate have been obstructed. JOAR made efforts to create awareness through pasting posters in public places, and distributing books, the UCIL management stooped low enough to declare to give monetary reward to those who tore down the posters.
Once again the UCIL shamelessly used the poor villagers who are dependent on mines for livelihood as their defence against those who are opposed to the mining project, and are well aware of the falsities of EIA/EMP report. Several persons paid by the company to obstruct the hearing cordoned off the premises of the public hearing and several people were not allowed to enter in particular those who sought to question the EIA/EMP report. The police and the local administration blatantly refused to intervene and maintain a congenial environment for the public hearing. The police and the local administration resorted to making callous remarks such as “we cannot do anything, the people of the village don’t want you to go inside”. This is absolutely shocking. Even several media persons were prevented from entering the premises, this is the first instance of hte media being denied access. Journalists from the Hindu, Dopwn to Earth, Statesman, even the local media were not allowed. . Drunk men were not allowing vehicles to get to the spot of the public hearing. Hence it is absolutely clear that the public hearing was a complete farce and the role of the State Pollution Control Board, local police and administration is highly questionable. An immediate inquiry must be conducted on these complaints, and the various public authorities must be held responsible for the abdication of their responsibility and the illegal collusion with the UCIL. The public hearing held must be cancelled and a fresh public hearing be organized.

As far as the EIA report is concerened it is a complete farce and does not qualify even the minimum technical/scientific/legal standards. The data analysed in the report is manipulated. Some highly questionable aspects of the EIA report are: 1. The EIA report was made three years back 2. The data analysed in the report was collected over a period of three moths 3.The report uses German standards, without any explanation.
Futher the State Pollution Control Board, and the local administration did not fulfill any of its duties of circulating the draft EIA report/summary report, the report was not even given to the panchayat mukhiya. The villagers were not even informed of the date of the hearing. The newspaper report stated that the public hearing would be held in the Bhatin football ground, however it was finalaly oheld at the Bhatin UCIL Colony. It can be guaranteed that no person in any of the villages affected by the mining project is aware of what the EIA report states. Ironically the SDM, who was on the panel that chaired the public hearing  has stated on record before media persons that he himself has not read the EIA report.
The so called success of todays public hearing and the manipulated public support is likely to be used by the government as an example to site before the people of Meghalaya, Karnataka, and other parts of the country where uranium mining projects are pending. This is an attempt to silcence peoples movements, and question their credibility. We therefore demand an end to this farce and we demand a fare and impartial public hearing.
26 May 2011

Ghanshyam Biruly (JOAR, Jaduguda)
Dasmath Murmu (Majhi Pargana Mahal)
Shishir Tudu (Jharkhandi Organization Against Nuclear Reactor, Chapdi)
Anup Agarwal, Rajni Soren, (Human Rights Law Network, Jharkhand)
Aparna Ghosh (Lokejon, Kolkata)
Indranil Saha (Parmanu Bidyut Birodhi Prachar  Andolan, Kolkata)
Mita (Shatabadi, Kolkata)




হিরোশিমা থেকে কুডানকুলাম –‌ বোমা থেকে বিদ্যুৎ

৬ই অগাস্ট ২০১৩ তে মেটিয়াবুরুজে একটি স্কুলে দেখানো একটি স্লাইড শো ... ফন্ট এবং লে-আউট ম্যানেজ করার জন্য ছবি হিসাবে স্লাইডগুলো তুলে দিলাম।
=========================













তারাপুরের একটা গল্প – একজন বৈজ্ঞানিকের জবানিতে

১৯৬০ এর দশক। তারাপুরের Atomic Reactor চুল্লিতে Radioactive water leak। লেখাপড়া জানা ইঞ্জিনিয়াররা ক্যাম্পাস বয়কট করলেন নিজেদের আর পরিবারের নিরাপত্তার চিন্তায়। বললেন – এই বিষাক্ত জল না সরলে কাজে যোগ দেবেন না। রয়ে গেল ঠিকা শ্রমিকের দল। তদানিন্তন BARC Chairman শ্রীনিবাসন সাহেব ডিনারে বসে বললেন “Give those buggers 50 Rupees, they will clean it up”। তথাস্ত – যেমন ভাবা তেমন কাজ। ঠিকা শ্রমিকের দল ৫০ টাকা মজুরিতে ১৮ ঘন্টা খেটে জীবনের সেরামজুরিতে কাজ করে ক্যাম্পাস দূষণ মুক্ত করে দিলেন। তখন বম্বে কলকাতা এসি ট্র্রেন ভাড়া ৫৩ টাকা। সুতরাং ৫০ টাকা মজুরি ১৮ ঘনটা কাজের জন্য অনেকটাই। শুধু একটা শর্ত – তাদের আর কোনোদিন কোনোকাজে ডাকা যাবেনা।
৬ মাস পর, ব্যক্তিগত উদ্যোগে খবর নিতে গেলে দেখা গেল তাদের মধ্যে ৬ জন মারা গেছেন ২০ দিনের মধ্যে বাকিদের খবর নেই।
৫ই জুন ২০১১, PBBPA Workshop এ এক বৈজ্ঞানিকের জবানবন্দির ভিত্তিতে অনুলিখিত।

কেউ তো কথা রাখেনি ....

একদা একটি বিদ্যুৎ উৎপাদন শিল্প ছিল। তার নাম ছিল পরমাণু বিদ্যুৎ। যখন সে ছোট ছিল, তখন সে জ্বলজ্বল করত উজ্বলতায়। সে তখন খালি ইউরেনিয়াম পোড়াতো আর বিদ্যুৎ উৎপন্ন করত। এখন তার বয়স হয়েছে। সে এখন টাকা পোড়ায়, ইউরেনিয়াম নয়। 

কেউতো কথা রাখেনি। কথা ছিল বিদ্যুৎ আসবে সস্তায় গরীবের বাড়িতে। এখন পেলাম খরচ এত বেশি যে আর হিসাব করতে পারছি না।

ফুকুশিমার চুল্লির আগুন ঠান্ডা করতে জাপানি সরকারকে খরচা করতে হচ্ছে ২০৪০ কোটি টাকা। বানাতে হবে বরফের দেয়াল। শেষ চেষ্টা যাতে বিষাক্ত দুষিত জল সাগরের জলে আর মিশে না যায়, অন্তত কম যায়।

রাবনের চিতা কি এত কম টাকায় নেভে? টেপকোকে বাঁচাতে জাপানের বেরিয়ে গেছে ৬৬,৩০,০০,০০ টাকা। শেষ পর্যন্ত লাগবে এরও প্রায় দ্বিগুন টাকা আর অপেক্ষা করতে হবে ৪০ বছর।

তবুও বিজ্ঞানীরা বলে চলেছেন পরমাণু বিদ্যুৎ করবে মুশকিল আসান। করবে বিশ্ব উষ্ণায়নের সমাধান দেবে সস্তায় বিদ্যুৎ! ইংরেজ সরকার বাজেটের সব টাকা খরচ করে ফেলল শুধু পরমাণু ঘটিত গোলমালকে ঠিক করার অক্ষম চেষ্টায়, মানে থাকলনা অন্তিম সময়সীমা মানে deadline এর। সরকার আজও খুঁজে চলেছে সেই বুদ্ধিমান ব্যাবসায়ীকে যে বানাবে পরের পরমাণু চুল্লিটা।

কেউ তো নেই কোথাও নেই। আছে কেউ কেউ আছে যারা ব্যবসা যুগিয়ে চলেছে ফ্রান্স (যেমন কুদানকুলাম), রাশিয়ান (যেমন রূপপুর, বাংলাদেশ) আর চাইনিজ কোম্পানিগুলিকে। 

একটা জীবন্ত পরমাণু বোমাকে আটকে রাখতে গেলে টাকার পরোয়া করা চলে না। 

নিশ্চিত করতে হবে নিরাপত্তা। নতুন গবেষনা নতুন বিপদ সামনে আসছে, বাড়ছে নিরাপত্তামূলক ব্যবস্থার খরচের বহর। আধখানা শতাব্দী লেগে যাবে উদ্ধার পেতে আর নিরাপত্তার খরচ ... সে কথা আর কি বলার আছে।

পরমাণু বিদ্যুতের সমর্থকদের কাছে এর উত্তর একটাই যেটা তারা দিয়ে আসছেন প্রতিনিয়ত - পরের বার আর এমনটা হবে না। কিন্তু ফুকুশিমা? সে তো আবার প্রমান করল এমনটাই হয়ে এসেছে, এমনটাই হবে। কেউতো কথা রাখেনি, অভিযোগ জানবো কাকে?

ফুকুশিমার বিষাক্ত জল ২২০০ millisieverts দূষন ছড়াচ্ছে প্রতি ঘন্টায়। বর্ম দিয়ে ঢাকা না থাকলে এই জল মানুষকে মেরে ফেলবে এক ঘন্টাতে। বিপর্যয়ের পরও, কথা ছিল এর চেয়ে ২২ গুন কম দূষনের। কেউ তো কথা রাখেনি...

কিন্তু এবার মনে হয় গল্পটা অন্যরকম হতে চলেছে। জাপানের ৫০টি চুল্লির মধ্যে চালু আছে এখন মাত্র ২টি। এরাও বন্ধ হতে চলেছে ১৫ই সেপ্টেম্বর, মেরামতির জন্য। ৫০ বছরের মধ্যে এই প্রথম জাপানে একটিও পরমাণু বিদ্যুৎ কেন্দ্র থাকবে না। ইংরেজ সরকারকের পরমাণু পুনরুজ্জীবন প্রকল্পের স্বপ্নকেও মনে হচ্ছে হার মানতে হবে কঠিন বাস্তবের কাছে। 

পরমাণু বিদ্যুতের মিথ্যা স্বপ্নের ভোর ফিকে হয়ে আসছে কিন্তু অপেক্ষা করছে এক নতুন ভোর ২১ শতকের ভোর - পরিবেশ প্রকৃতির সাথে হাতে হাত মিলিয়ে এগিয়ে যাবে প্রযুক্তি, হাঁটবে না সে পিছন দিকে, ২০শতকের দুঃস্বপ্নের দিকে।

- Damian Carrington is the head of environment at the Guardian
অক্ষম অসম্পূর্ণ বাজে অনুবাদটা আমার
September 7, 2013 

Draft Agenda of Discourse on Nuclear Power After Fukushima (Lokejon)

Draft agenda outline
Objective: To empower the group of participants with the knowledge about nuclear power generation and impact of it over society and nature. The participants should feel the immediate need to react over current plan by existing governments including India and US.
Audience demography: A group of 50 people. Politically conscious with distinct and diverge political views.

Suggested points as discussion outline pointer:
Why there is a need for nuclear power – It is assumed that audience is already convinced about the fact that unlimited usage of fossil based energy consumption will lead to two unavoidable disasters:
1.       The natural sources will be exhausted
2.       It will cause global warming – thermal power especially coal based power plants are seen as major contributor to the cause of global warming.
In this light, the audience is already convinced about nuclear power as a better and greener option. The general mainstream media propaganda qualifies Chernobyl as human error and Fukushima as one of the stray incidents which can be avoided with due measure and precautions. Some of the propaganda for example identifies GE Mark 1 design as a primary cause of the disaster. According to them, it could have been avoided easily had Fukushima upgraded to better technology. It is seen as an issue of compliance where the state regulatory bodies will have to enforce the compliance model without any corruption. Promoting nuclear power is a declared agenda by Obama. Recently, Obama has announced plans to cut U.S. oil imports by 30 per cent over the next decade at a speech to an audience at Georgetown University, 30th March. A similar feeling is shared by common urban middle class people.
All is well but …..
Even if all is well i.e. we apply the best in class technology to generate power, there are a few points which need special attention. These are:
·         The average cost of nuclear power generation is very high. In U.S Nuclear power plants typically have high capital costs for building the plant, but low fuel costs. Therefore, comparison with other power generation methods is strongly dependent on assumptions about construction timescales and capital financing for nuclear plants. Cost estimates also need to take into account plant decommissioning and nuclear waste storage costs.
·         No technology can ever guarantee protection from all kind of possible disaster like unplanned power failure. The Mark 1 design flaw for example, was highlighted 35 years back by Dale G. Bridenbaugh and two of his colleagues at General Electric. They resigned from their jobs after becoming increasingly convinced that the nuclear reactor design they were reviewing -- the Mark 1 -- was so flawed that it could lead to a devastating accident.
·         Commissioning and monitoring the compliance model has seen the history of corruption and fake accounting for example Days before Japan plunged into an atomic crisis after a giant earthquake and tsunami knocked out power at the ageing Fukushima nuclear plant, its operator had admitted faking repair records - AFP reports. August 2002 Japan – A widespread falsification scandal starting in that led to the shutdown of all Tokyo Electric Power Company’s 17 nuclear reactors; Tokyo Electric's officials had falsified inspection records and attempted to hide cracks in reactor vessel shrouds in 13 of its 17 units. India’s standing per Transparency International - India’s Corruption Perception Index: 3.3 in a Scale of 0 to10 10 (highly clean), 0 (highly corrupt).
·         The cost of a disaster recovery from a potential disaster is substantial for an economy to collapse. The estimated cost assessed so far of Fukushima disaster is about 200 Billion USD. The cost of Chernobyl in Belarus for example is estimated at £235 billion. Relate the recent nuclear liability bill in this context.
·         Under normal operation with no special media attention, there are regular leakages from nuclear plants for example
o   Fifty-five workers at the Kaiga plant needed medical treatment for excessive exposure to radiation after tritium contaminated a water cooler. – source BBC News, 29 Nov, 2009.
o   “Radioactive tritium, a carcinogen discovered in potentially dangerous levels in groundwater at the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant, now taints at least 27 of the nation's (US)104 nuclear reactors — raising concerns about how it is escaping from the aging nuclear plants.” – Associated Press 1st February, 2010.
o   ROCKVILLE, Md (Reuters) -- Managers of a big Texas nuclear power station told U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff last week they do not know what caused a leak in the plant's reactor, a discovery that could set off safety shutdowns at dozens of other plants.
o   December 12, 1952 - A partial meltdown of a reactor's uranium core at the Chalk River plant near Ottawa, Canada, resulted after the accidental removal of four control rods. Although millions of gallons of radioactive water poured into the reactor, there were no injuries.
o   October 1957 - Fire destroyed the core of a plutonium-producing reactor at Britain's Windscale nuclear complex - since renamed Sellafield - sending clouds of radioactivity into the atmosphere. An official report said the leaked radiation could have caused dozens of cancer deaths in the vicinity of Liverpool.
o   Winter 1957-'58 - A serious accident occurred during the winter of 1957-58 near the town of Kyshtym in the Urals. A Russian scientist who first reported the disaster estimated that hundreds died from radiation sickness.
·         The danger of proliferation of nuclear weapons. All of the new nuclear weapons states obtained their weapons under the guise of nuclear power generation. The difficulty of distinguishing between civilian and military nuclear programs is exemplified by the situation in Iran. Known reserves of uranium are only sufficient to meet the world's total energy demand for two years. It is sometimes argued that a larger amount of electricity could be obtained from the same amount of uranium through the use of fast breeder reactors. But fast breeder reactors are prohibitively dangerous from the standpoint of nuclear proliferation because both the highly enriched uranium from the fuel rods and the plutonium from the envelope are directly weapons-usable. It would be impossible, from the standpoint of equity, to maintain that some nations have the right to use fast breeder reactors, while others do not. If all nations used fast breeder reactors, the number of nuclear weapons states would increase drastically.

Nuclear submarine – a hidden power station that kills sea when it gets killed in military strike. As for example:
Israel bombed Syria nuclear reactor. Israel destroyed a secret Syrian nuclear reactor in September 2007, according to a US diplomatic cable cited in the Israeli Yediot Ahronoth daily.The cable, which the Israeli paper said it had obtained ahead of its publication by WikiLeaks, was written on April 25, 2008, by then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and stated that “on September 6 2007, Israel destroyed the nuclear reactor built by Syria secretly, apparently with North Korea’s help.”Yediot said the cable provided the first official confirmation of the attack…..
·         The problem of disposing of nuclear waste has not been satisfactorily resolved
The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository is the United States' designated deep geological repository storage facility for spent nuclear reactor fuel and other high level radioactive waste. The repository is to be on federal land adjacent to the Nevada Test Site in Nye County, Nevada, about 80 mi (130 km) northwest of the Las Vegas metropolitan area. The repository was within Yucca Mountain, a ridge line in the south-central part of Nevada near its border with California.
Although the location has been highly contested by environmentalists and residents, it was approved in 2002 by the United States Congress. Funding for development of Yucca Mountain waste site was terminated in 2010 and the NRC license application was withdrawn in March 2011. This leaves the United States without any long term storage site for its high level radioactive waste, currently stored on-site at various nuclear facilities around the country. The Department of Energy is reviewing other options for a high level waste repository.
Bottom line: There are only theoretical solutions available till date for the radioactive wastes including medical usage.
"All the waste in a year from a nuclear power plant can be stored under a desk." – Ronald Reagan.
·         At best, nuclear power generation can supply only a small fraction of the world's energy needs, and because of limited stocks of uranium and thorium, it can only do so for a short time.
·         If a careful accounting is made, the CO2 emitted by constructing nuclear power plants, running them, mining and refining the uranium, and decommissioning the plants is comparable to that emitted by coal-red plants.
·         In the countries where it is presently used, nuclear power generation is heavily subsidized, and if it were not for these subsidies, it would not be able to compete with wind energy or solar energy. It is vital that the subsidies be shifted from nuclear power to the development of various forms of renewable energy.
·         Global stand after Fukushima about nuclear power generation:
o   Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has ruled out the possibility of nuclear power in Australia.
o   Switzerland has suspended plans to build new nuclear power stations until it has carried out a thorough safety review.
o   And German chancellor Angela Merkel has announced a three-month stop on plans to extend the operation of nuclear power plants.
o   “Beijing announced on Wednesday that it had suspended approval for nuclear power plants across the country, putting the brakes on a development programme that accounts for almost 40 per cent of the world’s planned reactors.” -  Financial Times, 16 March
o   Germany this week (16 March, 2011, FT) idled one-third of its nuclear capacity.
o   Spain, Switzerland, the U.K. and U.S. have all announced safety reviews.
·         Case study and detailed analysis of Chernobyl and Fukushima covering areas of contamination, effect of general rise in cancer among population, water, air and land. (Planning to show some documentaries and picture collages about these)
·         History of nuclear accidents so far – statistics and /or specific cases
o   Civilian nuclear accidents
o   Civilian nuclear incidents
o   Civilian radiation accidents
o   Crimes involving radioactive substances
o   Military nuclear accidents
o   Nuclear and radiation accidents
o   Nuclear tests and fallouts e.g. Pokhran
o   Sunken nuclear submarines
o   In India
Nuclear power accidents in India
Date
Location
Description
Fatalities
Cost
(in millions
2006 US$)
4 May 1987
Kalpakkam, India
Fast Breeder Test Reactor at Kalpakkam refuelling accident that ruptures the reactor core, resulting in a two-year shutdown
0
300
10 Sep 1989
Tarapur, Maharashtra, India
Operators at the Tarapur Atomic Power Station find that the reactor had been leaking radioactive iodine at more than 700 times normal levels. Repairs to the reactor take more than a year
0
78
The on line hours of unit 1&2 in 1990 were 7772 and 7827 hrs (source IAEA PRIS. Repairs lasting more than one year from 10 Sep 1989 can not yield such on line hours.surely something is wrong.
13 May 1992
Tarapur, Maharashtra, India
A malfunctioning tube causes the Tarapur Atomic Power Station to release 12 curies of radioactivity
0
2
31 Mar 1993
Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh, India
The Narora Atomic Power Station suffers a fire at two of its steam turbine blades, damaging the heavy water reactor and almost leading to a meltdown
0
220 The cost data is not on comparable basis. 2400 or so US 2006 $s for TMI and 220 for NAPS unit 1 is wrong.
2 Feb 1995
Kota, Rajasthan, India
The Rajasthan Atomic Power Station leaks radioactive helium and heavy water into the Rana Pratap Sagar River, necessitating a two-year shutdown for repairs
280
22 Oct 2002
Kalpakkam, India
Almost 100 kg radioactive sodium at a fast breeder reactor leaks into a purification cabin, ruining a number of valves and operating systems
0
30

·         Vision of India in nuclear power program – India has a flourishing and largely indigenous nuclear power program and expects to have 20,000 MWe nuclear capacity on line by 2020 and 63,000 MWe by 2032.  It aims to supply 25% of electricity from nuclear power by 2050. Currently nuclear energy is fourth major contributor after thermal, hydraulic and renewable energy sources. India’s vision of nuclear power:
o   Stage I - Pressurised heavy water reactor
o   Stage II - fast breeder reactor
o   Stage III - Advanced nuclear power system
·         On the ground fight by people at Haripur and Jaitapur - Safety at Jaitapur not my responsibility: Jairam Ramesh 16 March, 2011.
A French company, Areva, however is building the world's largest nuclear power plant, that too based on technology that has not been completely tested, in the pristine, beautiful coastline of Ratnagiri (Jaitapur Town), India.
• Once a nuclear plant is built it cannot be completely shut down and has to be maintained for perpetuity costing multiple times over the cost of building one proving that Nuclear energy is definitely not cheap.
• Today we don't need missiles to sabotage a Nuclear power plant and a computer hacker sitting in some nondescript corner of the world can do a much better job of sabotage and perhaps destruction of a nuclear power plant as the Stuxnet virus that has delayed the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant in Russia and threatens to do the same to Iran's nuclear facility in Natanz show.
• Half life of the spent fuel Plutonium in the reactor is over 24,000 years i.e. its danger is reduced to only half in that time and they have to be kept for an eternity, literally, before the spent fuel (the used Uranium from reactors) for it to become safe completely.
• The proposed Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant in Ratnagiri district of India, with 6 reactors, is an act bordering on lunacy because even if there is damage to one, all six will have to be closed which besides causing irreparable damage to ecology and the entire region, will lead to a loss of billions of dollars.
Approximate monetary estimation of commissioning Jaitapur plant:
For 6 reactors – 10 x 6 Billion USD i.e. 60 x 100 = 6,000 crores of Indian rupees approximately.
The life of the reactor expected – 30 years, can be extended to 40 years max with risk of major accident.
The decommissioning cost of the reactors – 1.5 to 2 times of commissioning cost i.e. between 9,000 to 12,000 crores  of Indian rupees approximately.
Note that in last U.S. presidential campaign a number of contestants including Hillary Clinton, agreed on record that nuclear power option is not viable for U.S. for two reasons:
a)      It is too much costly
b)      There is no technical answer till now  for nuclear waste management.

·         How to use RTI for getting more information
o   May we know what is the fund allocated and reserved for a possible disaster that warrants complete relocation of nearby people with appropriate readiness?
o   What is the square mile of impact (dead zone) in case of a possible disaster?
o   How will we know that the plant is not leaking radioactivity?
o   What is the waste management plan for the plant?
o   Are the security concerns – internal and external sabotage factors being considered? If yes what is the estimated cost and is it included in plant commissioning and maintenance cost? How will this cost be recovered?
·         Why mainstream media do not educate us? Is it a non issue?
·         History of data and accounting statistics provided so far. Chernobyl was denied completely by the administration in 1986 first.
·         Alternatives – the scope of this document limits this part. However following are some basic thought pointers:
o   Why we are not focusing on energy efficiency? Shopping mall lightning for example reflects our attitude towards the consciousness about this.
o   Improving the efficiency of existing nuclear power plant which is 50% – 55%
o   Improving the logistics in distribution and thereby can save i.e. earn an extra 13% without commission any new power plant.